|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
714
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 11:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
original poster blued 2/3 of eve, blobbed 700 dreads, wanted easy titan kills, got slaughtered instead because he forgot to take server capabilities into account and is now cancelling subscriptions because of "CCP fail". lmao. Btw. cancelling subscription isnt enough, you must biomass your character to show them you're serious! |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
714
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 11:26:00 -
[2] - Quote
Xortica wrote: We are talking not about war, but about broken game mechanic where HED-GP is example.
its not broken mechanic, you all simply overloaded the server far beyond limits what would you expect? Jumping into that blob is always a ****** idea, was it new to you after 8 years of eve? You wanted hed-gp that bad that it disabled any form of common sense or intelligence? Or was it just greed for revenge and easy titan kills?
Same happened in F4R before as your coalition sat with 100 chimeras and 2000 subcaps under a jammer. Guess why N3 didnt try to take on that? Because it was pointless and would result in a total defeat, same reason why you should've stayed away from HED last saturday. |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
714
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 12:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Xortica wrote:i was ask before. ask again. Why node die everitime n3\pl super in trouble. I can remember some ccp member give t2 bpo to bob, it can be done again or something similar (we allknow some ccp play as PL). WTS tinfoil hats
Xortica wrote:Why our sovereignty was off by CCP GM but he can't do it with n3\pl (he say way n3\pl get it - was a bug) ? Why doomsday work as clock when all others can't do anything? Who first enter system - win? maybe because you tried to online your TCU during downtime and N3 sov got messed up in a huge lag fight? CCP doesnt fix/reimburse anything after such lag events. |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
716
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 13:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
Xortica wrote:Nyan Lafisques wrote:[quote=Xortica][quote=Nevyn Auscent]
Or... you know... maybe next time don't pack 1000+ useless subcaps before you jump your big toys... Thx for advise but i can decide what to do my own
"i dont care how game works, I'll do things and expect them turn out how I imagine they should work. will complain to ccp otherwise and cancel all my subscriptions" |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
716
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 13:20:00 -
[5] - Quote
you wanted easy kills with your 700 dreads and what not, but you ignored server mechanics and got slaughtered like a bunch of noobs, thanks for those kills. |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
718
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 14:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Xortica wrote:Ckeumep wrote:Robert Caldera wrote:you wanted easy kills with your 700 dreads and what not, but you ignored server mechanics and got slaughtered like a bunch of noobs, thanks for those kills. So you say nobody can win this fleet that you brought there no matter how many ships attacking side can gather or what tactic they use? I think this is not a good game mechanic. What do think? What i say - you can see it in my posts. Problem is not in loose fight. Problem in game mechanic - use blob or imba carriers blob to win, and get first in system to win
yes, I say nobody can win this realistically. But its the same situation as when you sat under cyno jammer in F4R2 with 100 spider tanking chimeras, which you can only kill by a blob of capitals (according to your own words there is no other counter to carriers!), which isnt working under intact cyno jammer and said jammer being repped by all those chimeras once attacked you cant kill due to cynojammer.. you got the idea.
It was totally fine in your opinion since you got there first and locked down the system by your blob, you did a party about saving the system, why is this suddenyl a complete different sitiation and broken game in HED? |
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
719
|
Posted - 2014.01.20 14:43:00 -
[7] - Quote
Signal11th wrote:Robert Caldera wrote:you wanted easy kills with your 700 dreads and what not, but you ignored server mechanics and got slaughtered like a bunch of noobs, thanks for those kills.
survival of the fittest striked again. lol , survival of the fittest?
yes, survival of the fittest perfectly applies here. People who fitted their gameplay to existing game/server mechanics won a battle. On the contrary, the opponent, who completely ignored the environment and its rules got slaughtered like babies. |
|
|
|